Inkscape vs illustrator for cad1/21/2024 Never confuse a designer with their tools. The best operating system or the best software is the one that you feel most comfortable using and will help you get the job done to the best of your ability. One mistake a lot of newcomers to design often make (and I was guilty of this myself) is placing too much importance on the things that don’t really matter in the grand scheme of things, like which operating system is best or which software is best. But can Inkscape really replace Illustrator? As someone who has used both programs, I’d like to weigh in with my opinion. And geolocation issues.Īt least if tracing over somthing, the PDF contains the dimensions and other annotations that wouldn’t be part of an 3d model export.Īnother possible tool that could solve this overall issue for us would be some sort of Trimble Connect process whereby the model file (IFC, DWG, RVT, etc) is referenced into the SketchUp model as an “Underlay”…but does not actually bring across all its tags and settings and nested objects into SketchUp… I doubt that’s going to be possible though except for IFC, DXF, PDF (legal reasons).You could always use GIMP instead of Photoshop for raster image manipulation, but when it comes to vector graphics, Inkscape is a more cost-friendly alternative to Illustrator, and considering that Inkscape doesn’t cost anything, it clearly wins the price debate. Unfortunatley for SketchUp use, a DWG (or any other export from a pro design tool) can cause major issues with the modelling precision and ultimately may cause errors, crashes, etc. With PDF that all goes away - what you see is what they want you to see, and it has all the legal notes etc. That’s only about 10% of projects though - most of the time you work with a range of consultants who may not have any budget allowance to make your job easier. If you’re in a defined project team with a longer-term project, it makes sense to create a data sharing protocol along these lines. AND i get them to export it as a SKP otherwise its a huge mess and crashes eveything. I also explode every building down to basic 3d shell (otherwise it’s 1000s of unique nested groups on 100s of Tags) and I strip all the geometry of its colour (otherwise every edge just about has a unique colour). Because their cross section planes, elevatons and other stuff wont appear in Sketchup. If i receive architectural models (eg Archicad) i always ask for the 3d shell (for context) and a nested 2d DWG layer for each floor plan (ground,1st, 2nd,etc). It usually requires some process of simplifying the project model at their end, and working with you to choose settings that fit well for SketchUp (eg “dont triangulate every face”). Any time data is issued to you, best practise is for you to work with the peson who sent it to you so that they see it and can verify that what you get is what they intended. The rise of parametric modelling, GIS, etc makes export to DWG a LOT more difficult.ĭesign software handles 3d data quite differently by default so importing a 3d model into sketchup (or from sketchup into other products) may not work reliably and/or will result in lots of time spent rearranging things, triangulating meshes or building faces, etc. I often trade basic data, eg site boundary or other simple 2d info but even a preliminary plan exported to DWG these days may well contain 1000s of layers and 3d ‘components’, complex geometry (terrain model) and so forth. I can answer that from my perspective…and just cos its an interesting discussion…
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |